M. Meade
we ought to criticize
I think we
this
came
-A
we
have more than once told the Governor to strictly follow the Rules, which are already very favourable to the Police, and not to give them favourable treatment
are still more
the rules
not warranted by them
See also 82004
8.W. Imag
Commit this; for in despatch on 540 we said that!
divatters
Ok
Could we not put it that, if this man had been definitely given to understand that he would receive a pension of $583.96, Lord Knutsford having regard to the powers possessed by the laws of 1907 state would not interfere; but that he felt bound
point out that the proceedings bore nothing by the regulation - to explain why we considered that a pension of 40% to a man retiring at 45 in indifferent health
decreed, after 17 years service was not justified by
ingardia received years ago.
I see that in the despatch on 25549/87
"We had the words "not exceeding "inserted.
for the purpose that there might be some
"latitude in dealing with cases, were not
of recent date!!
AM 4/5
mero
2/5/98
to the
plausein granted Contrary rules
8u91575-
N. 89.
My Lord,
307
0.0.
8411 RECR Red 25 APR 91
Government House,
March
Hongkong, 24th March
I have the honour
to inform Your Lordship that
on the recommendation
of
the Acting Captain Superintendent of Police and with the advice
of
The Right Honourable Lord Knutsford, GCMG.
མཱ་
M. Meade
we ought to criticize
Ilink we
this
came
-A
we
have w
than once told the governor Strieth follow the Rules, which alread very favourable to the Police, and not to give them favourable treatment
are
still more
the rules
not warranted by then
See also 82004
8.W. Imag
Comit this; fo
in dess" on 540 we said that!
divatters
Ok
Tould we not put it that, if this kan had been definitch given to understand that Le would receive a pention of $583.96, Lond Knutsford having regard to the powers posses
If the you- under clause by ofthe laws of 2007 state would would not interfere; but that he fell bound
point out that the proceedians boe hot anthiiged Gy the regulation - texplain why whe considered that I pemain of 40 ths to a than reting at 45 in indifferent health
decimrit, after 17 years service was not jullified by
ingarria received years ago. yan
Isee that in the despatch on 25549/87
"We had the words "not exceeding "inserted.
В
a purpose that there mightts some
" latitude in dealing with case, were not
of recurt date!!
AM 4/5
mero
2/5/98
to the
plusein granted Contrary sules
8u91575-
N. 89.
My Lord,
to
307
0.0.
8411 RECR Red 25 APR 91
Government House,
March
Hongkong, 24" 41laws!!
I have the honour
6 inform Your Lordship that
on the recommendation
of
the Acting Captain Superintendent of Police and with the advice
of
The Right Honourable Lord Knutsford, GemG.
ж
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.